Our Creator defines reality. What He says is reality; all else is fantasy, also known as "sin." The difficulty with that statement is alternate meanings for "reality" which actually entail a rejection of reality. Surely by now we've all run into propaganda which abuses reality in part by abusing the language we use to describe it, stripping away valid alternative meanings until we are left with some emotion-laden weapon. Do this with enough terms related to a particular subject and there's no rational discourse left on it. It only plays into the hands of propagandists if someone discusses the subject from far outside reality. It's common to find such voices are mere actors, secretly serving the deceivers by creating a false counterpoint, an extreme no one really holds, silencing all the voices of reason in the middle for fear of being associated with the nuts. That is, unless we come together, agreeing to set aside the false framework. Keeping our grip on the Father's Word, let's examine a subject associated with these terms: Jews, banking, and New World Order.
We can do this without letting the conspirators or the conspiracy theorists frame the discussion. Conspiracy theories persist not simply on popularity, but also by having at least some basis in reality. The trick is to realize when the official sources are lying, too. We want truth. All truth is God's truth, so getting to the bottom of things requires knowing Him. I won't play the game of saying your different conclusion makes me doubt you know Him, and I hope you'll give the same courtesy to me. The path to my answer isn't straight because the whole field of study is twisted and layered with centuries of junk. The starting place, the anchor of reality, is revelation.
The Bible records the revelation of God. The revelation took place within a particular culture, connected to a particular nation, both arising during a well-known period of history, on a particular patch of Planet Earth. The point of God's revealing Himself includes each of us accepting and internalizing that revelation. It's a tough job at times translating His revelation from those people, that time, that place, but intervening history shows it pays off, even when poorly done. Incumbent on us is our understanding their ancient tongue in the context of its people, place and time as much as possible.
To pretend the whole Bible is self-evident once we've accomplished a rough equation of words is patently childish, and a rejection of part of that revelation. Motives may vary, but rejecting such a study is often connected to the inconvenience of having to learn that much. An ancient civilization is not something we grasp in a day or so. Indeed, this whole question of comparing civilizations is rather hard work. Because the point of this article involves the people God used to bring us all good things, we need to see them with clear eyes, not through layers of myth. God's unique people were still people, and didn't always please Him. His prophets to that nation indicated they were probably the most difficult of all nations. With all their ups and downs, we have to see how their worldview continues to affect believers now some 2000 years past the last divine recording of God's revelation.
In a sense, Bible History is the story of a civilization. "Civilization" means, among other things, a certain restraint exhibited by an identifiable group of people. It is invariably an expression of cultural bias in favor of reducing violence in particular, and human suffering in general. It's primary evidence is a code of behavior, but is clearly based on a substrate of assumptions about what is really and truly good and bad in human actions. Thus, the code of behavior remains somewhat more flexible than simple rules, as the aim is not compliance to code but a particular result. Depending on other cultural factors, civilized people react to uncivilized behavior in various ways, ranging from a mere "tsk-tsk" to a rather harsh social enforcement.
Through that nation we call Ancient Israel came the very foundation of what it means to be civilized, as symbolized in the Covenant of Noah. Clearly stated was the ultimate penalty of death on anyone who bore a casual disregard for the lives of other humans. This extrapolates, as the biblical recorded intended, to a sense of social responsibility for other humans. We are obliged to form a community which values human life, and works to reduce human misery. We are obliged to get involved in the lives of others because it is in our own best interest.
In recent decades, Westerners have vastly reduced the habit of social enforcement. We have attempted to pass this off to the civil government, which is ill equipped for the task. This reflects the degree to which the current civilization is breaking down. The very nature of humanity makes civilization cyclical, and the current civilization is in the later stages of its cycle. In popular terms, "All Hell is breaking loose." That's literally correct, since even a casual reading of Scripture confirms God's favorable view of civilized behavior. The reduced use of social enforcement mechanisms is simply a matter of their failure. They fail because increasing numbers of the population at large refuse to internalize civilized behavior. They have rejected civilization as an impediment to their particular vision of happiness.
We could easily get caught up in a debate over competing kinds of civilization. Yet the core meaning of the term "civilization" is the totality of social habits which permit humans to live in cities -- to pass each other in a confined space without a significant rate of assault taking place. We don't set aside our territorial instinct, but modify it's meaning. Obviously, people have to value something so greatly they will withstand the strain of others crowding around them. They will accept the shared responsibility of neither provoking nor being provoked to exercise our territorial instincts. The brutish challenge and response of chest-beating dominance is substituted for a general acceptance of pre-defined roles, whether egalitarian or stratified. Consciously or not, people know such swallowing of pride permits a greater degree of creature comforts, as a result of the higher economic efficiency of increased specialization.
Those who fail to associate the necessity of civil behavior with creature comforts are seen as predators, and their behavior is labeled "criminal" -- they won't play by whatever rules exist. Each society produces their quota of misfits, and these will always be marginalized in one way or another. Place the blame where you like; if you don't fit in, it will cost you in one way or another. While the social regime can be made to adjust, the likelihood of any one campaign to change the majority view of what's acceptable is small, barring mass deception. Too many proposals for change are based on flawed theory, not upon long observation of actual human behavior. Since we seldom sit down and plan a new civilization as a whole, because we tend not to see it as a whole, we are beset with efforts to change this or that small feature. Sadly, each new proposal seems to ignore the lessons of history. Changes which have been made often contain a hidden favor to replace one dominant group with another. Claims regarding justice and morality are false when the effects of proposed changes conflict with the God's Word. All the more sad, when you consider a sovereign God has warned He will most certainly allow a civilization to fall if it ignores His warnings about what should be tolerated.
I would hardly be the first to say Western Civilization has ignored God's warnings. We have certainly done no better than biblical Israel.
Indeed, it might be said we have joined their madness. The coming of Christ ended the one and only national covenant between God and mankind. All of Heaven's business since that time has been entirely through Christ. What was then the Nation of Israel rejected that truth, and they have continued to reject it. Further, they have managed to persuade far too many Christians who should know better. Under the deception of maintaining their uniqueness in God's plan of redemption, some associated with that nation have conceived a way to assert what they consider their rightful place at the head of humanity, with Western Christian support.
Here's where we begin dealing with that term at which everyone rolls their eyes: International Jewish Banking Families who seek to rule the world. The word "Jewish" here is our big problem. Ask anybody what "Jew" means and you get varying, and often conflicting, definitions. Even Jews argue about it. Wouldn't it be simple if the word meant "those who practice Judaism"? But then we'd have problem with folks like Seinfeld and Woody Allen who consider themselves Jews, but are essentially agnostic or atheist. If we try to use "Hebrew" to describe an ethnic group, that might also be misleading. Nor are they properly "Israeli" because they aren't all citizens of that modern country. If I said "Semite" it would be inaccurate, since a good many races descend from Shem, and those races never had much to do with the Children of Israel. No, I'm afraid we're stuck with using "Jewish" as a term of cultural orientation, because it's germane, but not central, to the discussion.
Let's toss aside the racist connotation many conspiracy mongers attach to the word "Jew." That is, what I am about to say here in no wise justifies singling out all Jews on earth for hatred, or even suspicion. At the same time, we have to strip away the hyper-sensitive reaction of the ADL bunch, who want to say any criticism of anything Jewish is anti-Semitism. Stop and consider: King Ahab was a Jew. Was he a good guy? Not according to Scripture (1 Kings 16:30). How about King Manasseh? Nah, he was really bad (2 Kings 21:1ff) -- that is, until he turned around at the end of his reign (2 Chronicles 33:13). Yet the official record still listed him as evil. There are other examples, just as there are examples of good guys. So in terms of moral norms, Jews can be good or bad, and the default should be neutral. On top of that, as with any other human, the same individual is likely a mixture of good and evil, given to broad fluctuations at any given moment.
Even trying to restrict ourselves to the term "Talmudic Jew" won't work. This term is popular with a few conspiracy theorists who aim at accuracy, but I can't agree with their assessment of motives. It might have been accurate at one time, but not necessarily in the current situation. That is, the whole thing probably grew out of the Talmud and some other cultural artifacts of modern Judaism; it still flavors some of the apparent motives of some principal figures today. However, it's rare to find a religious Jew who doesn't adhere to the Talmud, and a great many of them are repulsed by this attempt to dominate the world. In the end, we will have to restrict ourselves to name of the principle family as symbolic of all those actively pressing forward the central effort: Rothschild.
This family arose from a known context. That context includes Judaism, the Talmud, and sweeps in a bits and pieces of Hebrew History. Explaining this family and their work requires explaining that context. We note the religion arising from the Mosaic Covenant suffered a tremendous amount of loss even before Moses died. The whole thing was under a constant assault, and required frequent renewal in the hearts and minds of the people. Were that not so, there would have been no prophets after Moses. Stephen sums it up nicely:
O stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so you do. Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who foretold the coming of the Just One, of whom you have now been the betrayers and murderers; who received the Law through disposition of angels, and did not keep it. (Acts 7:51-53)
Further, if you skim through Jonah, you get a distinct impression at least some Jews were pretty racist, themselves. It peeks out from time to time. They never had trouble remembering they were the select People of Jehovah. Things got pretty depressing during the Babylonian Exile, but they got over it. Oddly, only a tiny minority returned to the land of Judah after the decree of Cyrus to repatriate all captive nations from the conquered Babylon. Those who did return began to suffer a renewed arrogance at a level not seen before the Fall of Jerusalem. A part of this was the birth of the Messianic Expectation. They forgot this required they repent. Too many heard only the part about the Messiah coming to rule on the Throne of David, and how all the world would come to them, etc. If you survey the collected false Messianic Expectations rampant during the Restoration, you'll see it in full flower. They were looking for all the world to voluntarily come and be slaves to the Jews, dragging their wealth along with them as gifts.
There was also a very strong element of materialism in connection to this. From scattered references, we find indications the Jews in Babylon were not too despondent for long. Quite a few noble families, and not a few priests, got involved in primitive banking. They weren't allowed to charge each other interest, but nothing precluded them from loan-sharking Gentiles. There are hints the planned genocidal attack described in Esther was partially motivated by resentment of the Jewish bankers in the imperial capital. Something in Haman's conversation with Xerxes (Esther 3:9) hints at a strong profit motive connected to a custom of confiscation: The warrant to execute passed down to the actual executioner, who would take the victim's worldly goods, keep a set portion for his pay, and pass the rest up the chain. Bankers would make good pickings. The bankers were blue-bloods of Judah, and most of them stayed in Babylon. The bulk of Returnees were less wealthy. Thus, to some degree the false Messianic Expectations were motivated by envy, a response to the subtle contempt from Babylonian Jews who were known to claim Mesopotamian Synagogues were built on ground actually more holy than Mount Zion. Such sentiment was based on both greater wealth and the depth of scholarship in the rabbinical schools back in Babylon.
The arrival of Alexander the Great, followed by his zeal for building great libraries and academies to promote Hellenism, was the open door the Returnees had long sought to answer the smugness of the blue-bloods in Babylon. First, Alexandria, Egypt was the newest and hottest port on the Mediterranean Sea. There was money to be made, lots of money. Second, the library had a university attached, which wanted to open a department for Jewish Studies. The blue-bloods disdained to even notice, but the Returnees were hungry for wealth and influence. A great deal of Jewish money moved to Alexandria. A great number of rabbinical scholars went with it. These interacted with a large community of dispersed Jews (Diaspora) from around the Greek-dominated Mediterranean. These, while clinging to a semblance of their Jewish heritage, found Greek analytical tools very useful in studying their faith. In a very short time, we end up with a very vital and massive rabbinical college deeply infected with pagan Greek philosophy.
It was this compromised brand of Judaism 300 years later which Jesus fought constantly when confronting Jewish leadership. While the Pharisees were generally Eastern, and took pride in carrying on the pure Torah teaching from a series of great scholars from Babylon, starting with Ezra, even their conservatism was infected with Hellenist assumptions. The targums (Aramaic paraphrases from an ancient Hebrew few Jews understood any longer) were read through Hellenistic eyes. In the end, the Alexandrian translation of the Old Testament into Greek, the Septuagint, showed broadly the evidence of Hellenism in a departure from purely Semitic emphases in the minute choice of phrasing the translation. The other major party in Judea were the secularist Sadducees, mostly priests, and the wealthiest by far. Most of Jesus' teaching smacked of populist pietism and unschooled thinking to both parties, and gave them the excuse for making it all political. His call for a return to pure religion sounded like a throwback to Eastern Mysticism in their modern, paganized and materialist ears.
Today we still have the Talmud, a collection of interpretive material mostly coming from Babylon, but read and taught from a mostly Hellenized viewpoint. In this sense, we have what many conspiracy theorists mean by "Talmudic Jews." But the Rothschilds are not confined to that today.
Christianity, too, suffered some corruption during the Middle Ages. Once wedded to government, the Church was forced to compromise with worldly secularist attitudes. Even while civilization was being reborn following conquest from the primitive Germanic tribes, many locales never let Jews forget they had rejected Jesus Christ. They used it as a justification for oppression. At the same time, few had the skills and experience to match the Jews' centuries in banking. Their success allowed Jews to dominate the market. In a certain sense, Jews were the bankers to all Europe. This made them a target for those who resented that success, and resented needing those loans. Jews did plenty of other things, but no one seemed to notice. It was the same sort of animosity Jews faced under Xerxes, and it's only fair to note the sentiments were often reciprocal.
The Jewish cultural habit of cohesion against outsiders was only reinforced, and there arose a banker-merchant community among them. Naturally, they didn't charge each other interest (Exodus 22:25), and the rules of cooperation were largely inviolate. Eventually, as the Christian Code of Chivalry tamed tensions between kingdoms, and the royalty class of Europe stabilized, this banking community gave rise to a larger merchant class among the Gentiles. This native merchant class, often funded largely by the Jewish bankers, was used to bring down feudalism. The power of the Roman Church was reduced, as well. The Rule of Law began to displace pure monarchy, and served to protect Jews as a whole. During this time, it seems the Jewish banking community became skillful at manipulating and taking advantage of those professing hatred for them. One of these bankers set up shop in Frankfurt, Germany: Mayer Amschel Bauer.
Bauer placed a red shield over his shop door. It was 1743, a time when literacy was still somewhat limited, and visual symbols served as both logo and business sign. The German phrase then for "red shield" was spelled rothschild (pronounced "rote-sheeld"). Most people today assume it is English, because the anglicized pronunciation is dominant, rather like "roth's child." At any rate, this man possessed a singular genius. While there have always been at least a few practicing Jews taken with a deep spirituality, kindly disposed to all humanity, Bauer was not one of them. He turned his genius into a mighty weapon of manipulation. In a few decades' time he had gained a measure of control over one king, and had great influence over several others. He carefully trained, then dispatched his sons to commercial centers around Europe and England. By that time, they had assumed as their family name the nickname based on the sign over the shop door in Frankfurt.
Using the same skills and tactics as their father, the Rothschild boys worked together, gaining effective control over the economy of Europe. Taking advantage of their private couriers, assessing the outcome at least a day ahead of official channels, Nathan Rothschild managed to gain sole ownership of the entire stock exchange of England while Wellington was defeating Napoleon at Waterloo, Belgium. The official story today is Nathan bailed out the failing economy of England. As near as we can tell, this was precisely what his father had planned for all of Europe -- gaining control while looking like saviors. Combine some inspiration from the victory recorded in Esther, a dash of contempt for Gentiles, perhaps some vestiges of unfulfilled Messianic Expectations, and it's not entirely a case of megalomania.
We need not see a hideous evil here, just a level of ambition many had held before and since, but this time with a means to making it happen. In return for their success, they and their fellow Jews were subjected to some of the most vile accusations. This fear and hatred gave birth to the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (PDF). It's obvious this pamphlet is a fraud. However, it is more a fraud of degree than of substance. Even a quick scan shows the spirit of cynicism and ambition which appears to characterize the behavior of the Rothschilds. A good guess is the booklet is an outrageous parody based on some actual documents taken from the Rothschilds and their allies. Perhaps this is by design, for it tends to misdirect. Those who reject it follow the mainstream path of ignoring the real threat presented by the Rothschilds, while those who believe the document tend to target all Jews. Of special note are some sections containing fairly advanced banking concepts, concepts actually used by the Rothschilds. However, the reality is the Rothschilds are hardly so omniscient. They at times suffered setbacks and complete reversals of some schemes.
While they did eventually gain some measure of control over the US economy, the Rothschilds suffered a major setback in the American Civil War.
Power and wealth cannot be divorced. Starting from nothing, if you gain either, the other is not far away. Both can be held in degree; nothing requires grasping for absolutes in order to make folks happy. The problem is fallen man can hardly develop a sense of proportion when it comes to these things. It requires application of an external standard. For Christians, understanding power and wealth as a spiritual reality allows us to fight fleshly desires for the worldly kind of power and wealth. While there is nothing inherently evil about having the worldly kind, it's what we are willing to do to achieve them which marks the line between right and wrong. Herein we define the evil of the Rothschilds: They would do anything to hold wealth and power, and their apparent intent is to hold them absolutely.
The Rothschilds had learned from a keen observation of human history it was not necessary to actually rule any country directly to have control. Nor was it necessary to own everything in sight, nor even merely the assets of those who ruled. All they needed was sufficient leverage to ensure they held the balance of power in the long run. Having gained sufficient control of European economies over a century, it came to the Rothschilds' attention European trade with the Americas could both strengthen their hold, or weaken it. The threat for them was the relative freedom of the American economy. There was no handle to grasp so it could be steered where they wished. Further, it was clearly on the way to becoming a much larger economy than all of Europe. Doing so without indebtedness to the Rothschilds had to be stopped. Having lost their first attempts to Andrew Jackson, they waited the next opening. A good first step was to divide the nation, and the simmering conflict between North and South offered the best opportunity. During or after a war, each would be more open to the manipulation and leverage which brought the Rothschilds power in Europe.
Seizing opportunity was the one best skill of the Rothschild Family. Nothing was certain. However, human nature was rather predictable in the main, in the broad scope of events. The Rothschilds sent an emissary to both sides of the brewing War Between the States. Here was an odd thing. The North had a long-standing merchant culture, quite familiar to the Rothschilds. This culture hardly hesitated to welcome the bankers from Europe. Yet the ruling clique in the White House did not trust banks, and frankly hated Jews. While initially taking a few loans from the Rothschilds early in the war, Lincoln eventually balked at the high interest rates and simply issued Union currency on inflation. The South had a pretense to nobility and little interest in the European style of business operations, yet had been crawling with Rothschild agents for decades. It was business as usual for them to accept loans from the Britain-based Rothschilds. Still, things did not turn out as planned. They had hoped the South would eventually win, but overplayed their hand in promoting "total war" in the North. Lincoln proved able to win the war, and remained a powerful force of opposition to the Rothschilds. Thus, they hired Booth to assassinate the President, and whisked him away to safety when the deed was done, making sure false witnesses planted another dying man in his place. Then began the task of gaining allies in the US government.
The Rothschilds had learned an active war economy brought its own profits. Even though they eventually had to write off Confederate debts, it could be a net gain for their longer plans. Their hope of gaining a US National Bank under their control went unfulfilled until the next century. A major part of their machinations included building connections with J.P. Morgan, and planting a new proxy in the form of the Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg families, all tightly united with the Rothschild Clan. With the eventual birth of the Federal Reserve Bank, they ended up with far greater control than they had ever hoped. The entire national economy of the US was delivered to them on their own silver platter. Subsequent events further cemented their control, as when FDR confiscated all private gold, and when Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. Eisenhower's warning of the military-industrial complex was actually about the Rothschilds, for they owned a controlling interest in all of it.
It appears the Rothschilds have a sliding scale of value assigned to people. It follows more or less the traditional Jewish pattern. Those born or married into the clan are given the utmost privileges, and have to go a long way astray to lose that status. Lesser Jewish banking and merchant families are rather like being in the greater tribe. Jews in general are favored, but so are most any Gentile bankers and merchants loyal to them. The greatest difficulty we have now is realizing the Rothschilds were not hesitant to sacrifice their own fellow Jews, as we shall see.
While their brand of elitism is a direct reflection of their Jewish heritage, this is hardly a fair reflection on Judaism. This is an elite group, willing to enslave the entire human race, for ends only they fully understand, and which ends are shaped partially by Jewish heritage. It also includes generous additions from Kabbalism and the Sabatean cult. Otherwise, it's just another elitist plot to rule the world, one of several we have seen in the past, still see today, and we will surely see others tomorrow. The difference is the Rothschilds are actually able to pull it off, so far.
Whether the Rothschilds still believe in a literal Messiah, it seems certain they have seized upon the glories of the Expectations as their just due. Thus, wealth alone is not their goal, but the means to an end. So also is the political power, which results from wealth, a mere tool for the greater purpose. At one point it may well be Zionism was the fullest expression of their plans, but it's no longer so. It is my firm conviction their ultimate goal has moved beyond Zionism, leaving that as a false lead. Their work only appears to aim at regaining the entire holdings of the Jewish Conquest, and perhaps all of Solomon's domain. Their real interest is to rule the world, and Modern Israel is now disposable.
Beginning with the Restoration Period for certain, and perhaps sometime before, a powerful strain within Judaism lost the idea they were required to seek God's favor. Instead, they simply assumed they had it by default, so long as they avoided the idolatry which got them exiled in the first place. All the more so among the wealthy and powerful; it had become a doctrine such a condition was proof of God's favor. It was implied if you were poor, you did not have that favor. Thus, the Disciples' apparent shock when Jesus said the wealthy would have a much harder time entering the Kingdom of Heaven (Luke 18:16-27). The Disciples seemed completely lost by such an idea, and asked: "Who then can be saved?" If the rich and powerful, who so obviously had God's favor, weren't going to enter Heaven, just who could? Jesus spent a great deal of time peeling their minds away from that assumption, by His private sessions with them, as well as His public teaching. That ordinary people could be wholly acceptable to God was very Good News, indeed. The rejection of this notion by the Jewish rulers, mostly Sadducees, was without a moment's consideration; the door had been closed long ago. The condition described by shalom -- peace, prosperity and safety -- was not to be "spiritualized," but had only one obvious meaning. Any other meaning of "God's favor" was a threat to the Jewish rulers.
The Sadducees saw nothing wrong with building strong ties with Rome, serving as the moderating force between the imperial government and Jewish people, so long as they could keep their homeland. It was their duty before God as shepherds of the people. Their failure leading up to the Jewish Revolt of 66 AD was in their lack of control over Rome. Roman emperors had managed to kill the golden goose by demanding far too much, and it was the Jewish peasants who rose up first. When Rome demanded they choose between their God and the Temple gold, versus paying burdensome taxes to Rome, there was no keeping them from hearing the voice of the rebel zealots among them. It was not the crushing of the peasants which bothered the Sadducees so much as the subsequent loss of their homeland. Rome expelled Jews from Jerusalem after the destruction by Titus. In their modern incarnation, the Sadducees as Rothschilds have learned to first make sure they control the Roman treasury. Then they took back their land in Palestine, but only as the down payment for full global ownership. The Rothschilds gave birth to Zionism; the links are too easily found. They were the first to propose in concrete terms a way through the political jungle and economic tangles. The modern Jewish State of Israel is their creation, and they maintain the appearance it is the center of all their devotion.
To speak against that state is not anti-Semitism. Indeed, there are several Orthodox Jewish groups against Zionism. Reading their literature, one can see they make a very good case why God is not behind modern Israel, that's its existence is not blessed. Rather, it was bought with money and influence. One need only note the Israeli government is a very long way from embracing the Covenant of Moses to realize these groups are right. While a latter day State of Israel may be in God's final plans, this one is not it. The battle successes are as easily explained by good financing and battle tactics as by miraculous intervention. Modern Arab nations have made a very poor showing on the battlefield, as they lack any of the organization and discipline of the Saracen Conquest. Thus, to support Israel today may well be good or bad for political reasons, but cannot be made a requirement for Christian holiness.
Consider this: It is well documented the Zionist leaders, serving the Rothschilds, did not hesitate to reject an offer from the Axis powers to save Jewish lives. The modern State of Israel as an entity was of utmost importance in their plan, not the lives of Jews. Thus, the Rothschilds do not hesitate to work against the welfare of any nation. People in the US today are asking "Why?":
"I must assume that these smart politicians are aware that this cannot go on without the country going broke, and that they surely must be aware that a service based economy where we don't actually make anything, aside from printed money, will eventually bring this country down to the level of Mexico and other Third World nations... So why?"
James asks the same question millions of Americans ask daily as they see their towns, cities and schools flooded with non-English speaking illegal aliens and legal immigrants. What and why is it happening? Zogby, Pew, Roper and Dobbs polls show that a stunning 80 to 95 percent of Americans demand our borders be closed. They want legal immigration reduced back to the pre-1965 levels so immigrants will assimilate instead of what's happening: enclaving and separating.
The Border Patrol is a fiction, because it's established fact they don't stop even 10% of the traffic crossing our border away from ports of entry. There are armed incursions, and often come bills in Congress to legalize this de facto invasion. Moral issues aside, this trend is guaranteed to destroy the integrity and identity of the US as a nation. While Woolridge's answer to why is a simplistic assertion it's all about the labor market and multi-national corporate lobbying, the bigger answer is this is what the Rothschilds want.
Conspiracy theorists make much of the Bilderbergers, Club of Rome, Trilateral Council, and the Council on Foreign Relations. It isn't hard to prove these are creatures of the Rothschilds. It's not about forceful government, but the illusion of consensus this is all good for us. If popular opinion can't be swayed, make it appear foolish. Either way, the best thing for the Rothschilds and Zionism is a vast Western economy united, with open borders, and ready to destroy the Muslims. Whether the various tools -- government figures and these global councils -- are actually in on the plan isn't important. Take a look at the Freemasons. At one point, they were useful to the Rothschilds, and there's reason to believe they created it. Through various missteps, Masonry became rather useless, and it's power curtailed. It is now a toothless relic of past power, serving only as a means to train businessmen to the future Rothschild world. They get used to working in secret societies, building strong back-channel business connections, protecting the insiders from minor inconveniences of the law, and occasionally the system identifies someone worthy of advancement for service in the cause. Meanwhile, it weakens their commitment to Jesus Christ, should they be inclined to such a thing, by substituting something with a close resemblance. All these organizations are problem enough as they are, but serve also as a means to keep attention away from the real source of trouble.
So it is with the Rothschilds themselves. If you are one who believes there is a coming personal Antichrist, rather like Left Behind, look for him to rise on the backs of the Rothschilds. They themselves are not some direct manifestation of the Kingdom of Darkness, though they are the current single greatest threat to human life and liberty today. If we are to encounter a serious case of Tribulation anytime soon, it will come via them. Even so, we could rightly call them a type of Antichrist, but they are hardly going to provide the DNA for the likes of Rosemary's Baby. That's fiction. The real issue will always remain: Satan is our true Enemy (Ephesians 6:12).
We see, then, the New World Order is mostly about banking, but the primary cover is Zionism. We also see not every actor on the stage has seen the full script. Because of that, the Rothschilds run into trouble now and then when a tool of theirs fails. Depending on how anxious they may be, expect them to take action independently, or wait for another opportunity. That's why we have Israeli spies in the US, and figures with Israeli-US dual citizenship. If those whose hands actually guiding the policy of the US don't run in the right direction, and can't be corrected, expect the nation to start having troubles -- big troubles. Recently, it seems to me some of the tools have been too zealous for their own profit, and the Rothschilds have begun pulling the rug out from under us economically. It didn't take much. We still have a lot of Jews in government, but they don't rule America. As it is, many of those in government aren't consciously on-board the Big Plan. Again, it's not about Jews at large, nor about Zionism specifically, but about war, banking, currency and behind-the-scenes control.
Nor is this a cue to promote Arab or Islamic causes as a foil. They are hardly innocent victims. I'll be the first to bring up the pagan background of Islam, and say right off Muslims are going to Hell without Christ as their Savior and Lord. It's the same for Jews and every other human. There was a time when we might have believed Israel was showing restraint, but that has been shown the lie it always was in the recent incursion into Gaza. There is no longer any excuse for clinging to the notion of Israel as victim when they hold every advantage, and are restrained only by the limits of funding and human energy in destroying. I can't be sure I wouldn't encourage sappers wearing bomb vests, though I would prefer military targets. However, no one wants to notice Israel is the primary source of arms and ordinance flowing into Gaza. When you see how often it is Mossad found doing the work behind so-called Islamic terrorism, it becomes easier to realize the whole thing is one big charade, with the troops on each side serving some purpose they may hardly comprehend. Palestinians willing to be used, or simply foolish enough, are not a commendation of their apparent cause. Pick your poison; neither side has a moral claim on us.
Yet here we are, as a nation committed to Zionism. How did we get here? It was primarily born through the teaching of Dispensationalism. Dispensationalism is a lie. No one can prove just yet it was started by the Rothschilds. More likely, it was a response of Catholic theologians to the common Reformation belief the Pope was the Anti-Christ. If you research the names Ribera and Bellarmine with Dispensationalism, you'll find a consistent story tying them to the birth of the concept. It passed through many hands before it ended up in the wild visions of Margaret McDonald and the teaching of Edward Irving and John Nelson Darby.
The whole concept nearly died in obscurity until an American scoundrel, C.I. Scofield, picked it up. Here we have the firm imprint of the Rothschilds, for it was their money and their agent, Samuel Untermeyer, who got Scofield's work published. Indeed, it seems Scofield visited England and got some coaching from the infamous duo, Westcott and Hort. These two were closet Catholics, involved in studying black magic, and proclaimed themselves superior Bible scholars so as to justify replacing the KJV with their RSV. Scofield would have preferred using their RSV for his study Bible, but knew better than to think it would sell. When finally published, the Scofield Bible came from Oxford Press, then clearly under Rothschild control. How sad we've had three or four generations of piety twisted by Zionist propaganda.
While we no longer see much of the Scofield Bible these days, the vast layer of falsehood is the foundation on which most modern organized churches address the question of Modern Israel. We now have leaders in Israel boldly saying they see no reason Israel can't sit in judgment of people from other nations, but no nation on earth shall be permitted to judge Israeli citizens, particularly in terms of war crimes. This bold assertion of privilege is designed to distract us all from what's going on in the background. We get riled up, divided into two camps. On the one side are those who support Israel without conditions, refusing to address the obvious war crimes. It's always justified by the conceit of how the Muslim Palestinians just won't recognize Israel's right to exist. Of course, the real cause is some urgent necessity to insure Modern Israel reclaim all the ancient kingdom territory, to satisfy conditions so Christ can come back. Meanwhile, on the other side are those who realize Israel refuses to recognize Palestine's right to nationhood. They see the utter lack of proportion in the constant warfare, blockades, etc. They rise up and condemn Israel quite justly. Somewhere in the background of this is the return of hatred for Jews. It gives rise to fresh attempts to debunk the Holocaust narrative. Pulling in as many threads as possible, we have a sharp division in world opinion into two camps, with various subdivisions inside each camp. There's room for every brand of hatred.
Meanwhile, no one is watching as this relatively small band of banking families consolidate their control over everything in sight. There is hardly a single unit of currency passed in this world which does not represent a loan from those banking families. They own several hundred currencies outright, though such ownership is exercised indirectly. Each of those currencies are released from their central banking system as a loan. For example, every US dollar in existence is note of debt. No matter how many dollars exist in circulation, all of them are a loan, upon which interest is due. The consolidated debt we owe is greater than all we own as a nation. Currently, it is slowly dawning on us the interest alone is greater than all we produce. We are materially incapable of servicing that debt. So it is with every nation hooked into the international currency exchange system. We are ripe for the picking in terms of literally seizing control, but there remain a few more nations not under that network. We can only guess whether they will attempt to rope these others in, or will rely on some other measure of control.
There are surely other factors which stay them from pulling the plug and plunging the whole earth into chaos. Quite likely, they would be unable to actually keep the whole thing in their hands when it happens. The gamble is huge, but the stakes are bigger yet. Human history is little more than a narrative of such efforts rising and falling. Each time, some uncontrolled variable, some portion of humanity outside the reach of authority, but not too far away to reach into that realm, has destroyed the plan. Indeed, the very nature of empire carries the seeds of its own destruction, and the Rothschilds empire is no different. It's not possible to gain absolute control, though it would appear they've come the closest so far. They stand on the borders of reality, the edge of what God will allow before He brings it down.
It all sounds like a bad movie thriller plot. Confirm the story for yourself; don't take my word for it. The foregoing is simply an outline. What to do? Continue serving the Lord. If you feel compelled to minimize your personal risks, consider getting completely out of debt, and avoid using banks. Prefer cash over any traceable means of exchange. Backup everything important to something you can carry and re-use. Learn to place the highest value on what you know, instead of what you have. Keep your worldly loyalties in the lightest possible grip. Know beyond all doubt all governments move from bad to worse, and the US will soon become a very unpleasant place to live -- unless there are some radical changes which are so unlikely as to be ludicrous. It's all in God's hands. If you place yourself in those hands consciously, your life will not be wasted.
By Ed Hurst
Revised 27 January 2009
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: People of honor need no copyright laws; they are only too happy to give credit where credit is due. Others will ignore copyright laws whenever they please. If you are of the latter, please note what Moses said about dishonorable behavior -- "be sure your sin will find you out" (Numbers 32:23)